OPENTRANSIT

2008 PEERING POLICY

                                                            (Reviewed in Dec 2007)

 

This Peering Policy describes the criteria that France Telecom – OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET, has decided for acting in direct and public peering relationships. This Peering Policy consists in establishing peering connections between OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET and peer networks where such exchanges are mutually equitable and are cost-effective. In addition to the criteria set forth below, OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET’s ability to enter into peering agreement with a particular carrier is subject to availability of peering ports and to OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET backbone capacity in particular locations.

 

I.            Definitions.

 

Autonomous System.  The Autonomous System (AS) is the representative entity dealing with IP network consistency we consider to exchange traffic over two peering partners. 

 

Geographically dispersed. Any two connections between OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET and a particular peering partner are geographically dispersed if they are either (1) 250 miles apart or greater or (2) located in different regions among the geographic.

 

Geographic regions.  Subdivision of the continent where OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET has nodes are set forth in Attachment 1.

 

Local peering. A local peering refers to interconnections contracted on a specific country with internet route from this country only. 

 

Mandatory points. In each region, some locations will be mandatory cities. It means that some cities are seen as major required points for peering relation. These mandatory points are 3 among these 6 cities in the US : New-York, Ashburn, Palo Alto, LA, Dallas and Chicago, 3 among the 5 following cities in Europe: Paris, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Madrid.

 

Private peering. Direct peering refers to an implementation of dedicated bandwidth between the larger Network Service Providers (“NSPs”) to reduce inefficiencies related to scaling interconnections between the large Internet backbones. Traffic is exchanged on a bilateral basis via local BGP-4 peering sessions.

 

Public peering. Public peering refers to an implementation of a BGP-4 peering session between NSPs through an exchange point (IX or NAP). The interconnection supports for public peerings are not dedicated.

Peering.  Where two interconnected networks exchange traffic strictly between their own networks.  See Private Peering and Public Peering.

 

Regional peering. A regional peering refers to interconnections taken with a peering partner over one of the major continent in the world.

 

Route announcement.  The means by which two peering partners notify each other of address information in order for the peering partners to exchange Internet traffic.

 

Transit relation.  Where one network uses another network to provide all or most of its connectivity.

 

II.             General Principles

 

A.    All private peering connections shall be at speeds of 155 megabits per second (“Mbps”) or higher.

 

B.    A consistent worldwide peering shall interconnect (in private or public) on geographically dispersed point in the world over Europe and America (US). A global peering consists in several peering locations both in Europe, and in the US. A global peering is contracted on a worldwide basis over two Autonomous System only.

 

       Whenever the peering partner has network presence in multiple continents where OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET also has Points Of Presence, it is mandatory to open peering legs in ALL possible continents. This is to ensure that the peering interconnections benefit both partners equally by making sure that traffic is exchanged optimally in the respective continents. In case Hot Potato routing is in place and that a single AS is used on both sides, this also allows to ensure that both parties carry the traffic on symmetrical basis.

       This applies for any entity, regardless if a single AS number is used in the multiple continents. In case different AS numbers are used on the partner side, peering with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET would be done in each continent with the respective applicable AS number on the partner side.

       For example, if a carrier having presence both in Europe and in USA solicits peering with Opentransit, peering has to be operated both in Europe and in USA (US alone or Europe alone is not possible). If a carrier has presence in US with AS#X, in Europe with AS#Y, then he must be ready to peer with France Telecom AS5511 with 2 ASes in each respective continent.

 

 C.         Peering connections shall be geographically dispersed. North America is seen as a region.

 

D.    No OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET transit customer shall be entitled to enter into a peering relationship with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET at the same time that such transit customer is maintaining transit connections with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET. OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET transit customers that qualify for a peering relationship may continue their transit connections on a graduated basis only until the transit customer’s peering connections with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET are operating and exchanging traffic.

 

E.        OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET will reset all BGP communities on received routes.

F.       OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET may reset all MED on received routes.

G.       Partner may implement filtering (AS filtering, route filtering, max-prefix limit) but have to inform OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET noc about such filtering and any modification on the filters.

H.          Partner must have route consistency on all peering points.

 

 

III.             Infrastructure Requirements for Any Peering Arrangement

 

Each peering partner shall meet the following infrastructure requirements:

 

A.    Each of the peering partner’s backbone hubs shall be connected to at least two other hubs on its own backbone at mandatory capacity (cf section E).

 

B.    The peering partner shall operate a fully staffed, twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week (“24x7 “) Network Operations Center (“NOC”).

 

C.    The peering partner shall establish “trouble ticket” and escalation procedures to resolve customer service issues.

 

D.         OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET would not come into peering relation with customer of existing peering partner.

 

E.    For regional and worldwide peering, the partner shall have a nationally-deployed, Internet backbone in the countries in which he desires enable a peering relation. The peering partner’s shall operate on dedicated IP circuits of at least OC-192 in the US and in Europe. Aggregated traffic must not be lower than  4.0 Gb/s.

 

F.    For local peering, the partner shall interconnect on 2 cities not necessary dispersed and have at least 4.0 Gb/s of aggregated traffic with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET.

 

 

 

IV.              Routing Requirements

 

Each peering partner shall meet the following requirements with respect to routing:

 

A.    The peering partner shall carry full Classless Internet Domain Routing (“CIDR”) at edge routers using BGP-4 and aggregated routes;

 

B.    The peering partner shall register routes (routing policy) with the Internet Routing Registry (IRR) or another OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET-recognized  Internet routing registry (RIPE,…);

 

C.    The peering partner shall implement routes filtering at the partner’s network edge;

 

D.    The peering partner shall provide consistent routing announcements, i.e., the same set of routes announced with the same autonomous system (“AS”) path length at all peering locations;

 

E.    The peering partner shall not establish a route of last resort, i.e., default route, directed at OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET;

 

F.    The peering partner shall announce only its own customer routes to OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET, not any routes from any of its other peers;

 

G.       All traffic exchanged between OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET and its peering partners shall be carried over the peering connections established between OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET and the peering partner. The peering partner shall not forward route announcements of the peering partner’s network via another provider.

H.       OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET will announce only customer routes originating from the peering area (either local, Regional or Worldwide). 

 

V.        Traffic and Capacity Requirements

 

A.            General Requirements for All Peers

 

1.  In order for OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET to consider an application to peer with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET, a potential peering partner shall provide OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET with a readable hard copy of its network within the region he whish to peer or a global copy if the request consists into a global peering, including a list of existing peering connections;

 

2.  Each operating peering connection with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET shall have a minimum 10Mb of bilateral traffic;

 

3.  Traffic volumes are measured in either direction, inbound or outbound, whichever is higher, on a weekly aggregated average basis over all the points where the parties exchange traffic. Any imbalance of traffic shall not exceed a ratio of up to 2,5:1 in either direction;

 

4.      When OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET cannot measure a prospective peer’s traffic because there is no existing connection or relationship between OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET and that prospective peer, OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET reserves the right to enter into a public peering relationship with that prospective peer prior to any direct peering relationship.  OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET may then measure the prospective peer’s traffic to determine if the prospective peer meets this Peering Policy’s volume criteria;

 

5.         All traffic must ingress and egress through peering points.

6.         OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET may shutdown any private or public peering without any notice if the link is loaded more than 95 % during more than 2 hours.

 

B.            Requirements Specific to Direct Peers

 

1.              In case of peering upgrade consideration, For each additional prospective peering connection to existing locations, beyond those for which the direct peering partner originally qualifies, the direct peering partner shall meet an average daily traffic utilization of 65% for an individual existing connection (based on its payload). (For example, a 155Mb connection would require about 96Mb average daily .

2.              OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET reserves the right to consider additional engineering factors to determine whether a peer satisfies daily utilization requirements.

3.              France Telecom may shutdown or alleviate peering if existing legs cannot stand 1 leg failure.

           

VI.             Interconnection Method for Public Peering and Direct Peering

 

A.            General

 

After determining whether a potential peering partner qualifies for peering with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET, Interconnections and the type of peering – i.e. whether public or direct – shall be determined according to practical economic considerations that are sensible for both parties.

 

B. NDA

 

All applicants must sign a Non Disclosure Agreement before discussing and establishing peering connections.

 

C.   Public Peering Arrangements

 

1.  Prospective public peering partners shall have active connections to at least three geographically dispersed interconnection points where and OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET is also connected.

       See http://vision.opentransit.net/docs/peering_policy/ix-points.txt for list of Public peering available.

 

2.  OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET may change the number of NAPs at which it peers, and, in the course of its peering relationships with partners, may alter the NAPs at which it peers with partners.  Neither OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET nor its peering partners shall implement any changes to the number or location of the NAPs without first providing the other party thirty (30) days’ prior notice.

 

D.   Direct Peering Arrangements

 

1.  Concurrent with the establishment of direct peering connections with any peering partner, OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET shall terminate any public peering exchanges with that  peering partner. No peering partner may be simultaneously connected with OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET as both a direct peer and a public peer.

 

2.         Neither party will apply port, service or other charges.

 

3.         In the case of private peering that necessitate the provisioning of a local loop (like an intra-building or a metropolitan link), all costs associated to this link are to be supported by the party having ordered it. The responsibility of supervision, maintenance and troubleshooting is also incumbent on this party paying for this transmission capacity.

 

VII.     IPV-6 PEERING

 

      IPV6 peering is now available on our network.

      IPV6 and IPV4 are considered as a whole, thus any ipV4 peers can apply for IPV6 peering too.

      In order to encourage IPV6 emergence, Opentransit can setup some specific ipv6 peers disregarding some critera of this peering policy.

 

VIII.            Violations and Corrective Measures

 

A.     Whether the criteria in this policy are met may be reviewed weekly. In the event that any peering partner fails to meet any of the criteria of this peering policy, OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET reserves the right to seek remedies, which may include but shall not be limited to charging the peering partner for all traffic that the peering partner sends over the OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET network. OPENTRANSIT-INTERNET also reserves the right to demand and receive full compensation from the peering partner

 

B.     Each peer has to respect the Open Transit Internet Acceptable Use Policy (AUP). This policy is designed to help protect Open Transit Internet’s customers and the Internet community in general. This policy is available following this link: http://www.opentransit.net/policy/AUP.html

 

C.         Peering agreement can be terminated with cause by either party with thirty days written notice.

 

IX.       Term

 

Peering agreements shall have a one (1) year term and shall automatically renew un

less cancelled by either party.  Agreements may be terminated at will by either party on thirty (30) days written notice.